Question and Answer: What's Your Take on
Multiple-Protagonist Novels?
by Lori L. Lake |
|
|
The following question came from one reader
and has several parts. I'll address them step-by-step.
Q. What's your take on
multiple-protagonist novels?
A. The first question I
would ask is this: is the book actually a multiple-protagonist
novel, i.e., is there more than one heroine seriously invested in
the plot outline and in the outcome of the trials and conflict? Or
do you mean you are presenting the story from multiple points of
view?
Q. My nascent novel seems to have six very
interesting (well, interesting to me, at least) lesbians who all
clamor for front and center.
A. This all depends on whether there is one main plot
line—or a number of plot lines that all seem somewhat evenly
weighted? (More on this later…)
Q. Can you think of any multiple protagonist novels
that succeed, so that I can read them and see how things
work?
A. I can’t think of any moderate length lesbian
romance/adventure with more than two major protagonists, though many
novels may tell the story from multiple points-of-view. For
instance, Jean Stewart’s ISIS books (there are 4 so far) have many
different POVs with several subplots, but Whit and Kali tend to be
the main characters, and their main goals and conflicts regarding
saving their home is the main plot. Many other characters are very
nearly main characters at various times, though, and you do tend to
grow to care about them. Still, the stories are largely Whit &
Kali’s.
I recently read the wonderful novel THE WOLF TICKET
by Caro Clarke, and she told the story from, if I remember
correctly, five points of view, including from the POV of the two
characters in love for whom we are rooting as they search for one
another. Each of the five characters’ experiences and circumstances
draw the plot closer and closer to fruition. Still, Bron and Pascale
are, I would say, the main characters. The story is essentially
about them, and the other POVs serve to tell their tale, even though
you do find out lots of things about those other secondary
characters.
Many novels tell the story from two POVs with two
convincing protagonists. Karin Kallmaker’s SUBSTITUTE FOR LOVE has
two very specific main characters—and one of them doesn’t even enter
into the book until about halfway through. Nann Dunne and Karen
King’s TRUE COLOURS and its sequel MANY ROADS TO TRAVEL have two
solid main characters. Most Uber stories tend to have two main
protagonists (the lovers, usually) or one of the two who is front
and center with the lover just a step behind her. Many lesbian
novels (like many of Shakespeare’s plays) have a main couple about
whom the main plot line revolves, but there are often one or two
other couples with subplot roles as secondary characters. Any of
those characters may tell some or all of the story or have it
narrated from their perspective.
Q. And is this too ambitious for a first-timer?
A. Nothing is ever too ambitious…if you can make it
work convincingly, then go for it. Trying to make a first novel
work, regardless of how complicated it is, will give you marvelous
experience. You learn what to do and what not to do for future
novels. You may also write a large part of this novel, discover what
doesn’t work, and revise and re-structure. Like swimming, the only
way to discover your style and learn to write is to wade right in.
Q. Does having more than one major protagonist always
weaken a novel? If not, are there certain pitfalls I should know
about?
A. A first-person POV can be very personal and direct;
and then again, the tale teller could also NOT be the main
character. M.E. Kerr’s DELIVER US FROM EVIE is told first person
from the 16-yr-old brother’s point of view, but the story is really
about his lesbian sister, Evie, and the bigger picture surrounding
their family. At the same time, any time a novelist tells the story
from 3rd-person POV from more than one other character it can also
be personal and direct—and effective.
People talk about character-driven stories and about
plot-driven stories. What kind of story is yours? Or is it a little
bit of both? Lesbian romances and adventures tend to be plot-driven
with solid characterization. If you have too many people’s POVs
swirling around, though, the plot better have narrative drive,
because without it, the reader won’t move forward. It gets a little
bit tiring for the reader to keep flipping from one consciousness or
one world view to another. Then again, that didn’t stop zillions of
us from reading Fannie Flagg’s FRIED GREEN TOMATOES, which was all
over the map with POV and even had newspaper and epistolary entries.
However, again, it was Ruth and Idgie’s story, even if there were
other secondary characters and events adding flavor.
When you are writing your six lesbian characters, do
their lives go off in tangents all over the book? Or does the
telling of the story follow some sort of solid plot thread through
the course of the novel? It may be possible that you have been
blessed with two or three novels and that you have to focus more on
one pair of women (meanwhile promising your other characters their
own subsequent novel).
Just remember that any time a character serves in a
1st- or 3rd-person POV storytelling role, the reader is going to
care about them in some manner. Sometimes that means that you hope
they get killed off because their behavior is reprehensible.
Sometimes it means that you grow to love them, even if they are
flawed. I just read Lynn Flewellings NIGHTRUNNER fantasy trilogy,
most of which is told from the POV of main characters Eric and
Seregil. But there are many scenes laid out from other secondary
viewpoints by critically important characters who tell parts of the
story that occur when Eric or Seregil are not there. It works
marvelously.
If you like, write in with more information or
questions, and we can examine this further.
—© Lori L. Lake, 2003 -
Associate Editor of Just About Write
Author of the novels
Different Dress, Gun Shy, Under The Gun, and Ricochet
In Time.
Back to Article
Archive.